Around 4:45 PM EST Today - 103rd Anniversary

Kinja'd!!! "SteveLehto" (stevelehto)
12/24/2016 at 08:37 • Filed to: None

Kinja'd!!!8 Kinja'd!!! 7
Kinja'd!!!

Today marks the 103rd anniversary of the Italian Hall disaster which happened on Christmas Eve, 1913, in Calumet, Michigan. Here is the piece I wrote on it a couple of years ago.

!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!


DISCUSSION (7)


Kinja'd!!! vondon302 > SteveLehto
12/24/2016 at 09:38

Kinja'd!!!1

Lived in Michigan all my life and never knew this story.


Kinja'd!!! SteveLehto > vondon302
12/24/2016 at 09:59

Kinja'd!!!2

Since it happened in the UP, many people think of it as a “UP” story and not a “Michigan” one. But it really should be more widely known.


Kinja'd!!! sm70- why not Duesenberg? > SteveLehto
12/24/2016 at 10:27

Kinja'd!!!0

Quick question for you, hope you don’t mind me asking.

I know the state I’m in has one-party consent laws for recording, but my question is: am I considered a party to a conversation, and therefore able to consent to the recording, if I am not in my car and my dash cam is running? i.e. Whatever conversations my dash cam might record a valet having in my car?

Thanks!


Kinja'd!!! SteveLehto > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
12/24/2016 at 11:28

Kinja'd!!!2

Not if you are not present. In MICH (and I suspect other one-party states) you must be a party to the conversation, which you cannot be if y ou are not there.

The trick would be to just disable the audio if you are not present.


Kinja'd!!! sm70- why not Duesenberg? > SteveLehto
12/24/2016 at 13:46

Kinja'd!!!0

That’s exactly what I needed to know, thank you.


Kinja'd!!! John Norris (AngryDrifter) > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
12/24/2016 at 15:01

Kinja'd!!!0

I typically leave my dash cam on when I valet my Duesenberg.


Kinja'd!!! sm70- why not Duesenberg? > John Norris (AngryDrifter)
12/24/2016 at 15:22

Kinja'd!!!0

Good to know